Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter X: Maintenance of Public Order and Tranquillity · A.–Unlawful assemblies
Section 129: Dispersal of assembly by use of civil force
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
An Executive Magistrate, a police station officer, or in their absence a police officer of at least sub-inspector rank, can order an unlawful assembly, or an assembly of five or more likely to disturb the peace, to disperse. If it does not, they can disperse it by force and require help from any male civilian, and arrest its members.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Any Executive Magistrate or officer in charge of a police station or, in the absence of such officer in charge, any police officer, not below the rank of a sub-inspector, may command any unlawful assembly, or any assembly of five or more persons likely to cause a disturbance of the public peace, to disperse; and it shall thereupon be the duty of the members of such assembly to disperse accordingly.
(2) If, upon being so commanded, any such assembly does not disperse, or if, without being so commanded, it conducts itself in such a manner as to show a determination not to disperse, any Executive Magistrate or police officer referred to in sub-section (1), may proceed to disperse such assembly by force, and may require the assistance of any male person, not being an officer or member of the armed forces and acting as such, for the purpose of dispersing such assembly, and, if necessary, arresting and confining the persons who form part of it, in order to disperse such assembly or that they may be punished according to law.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 129
- Dr. Anil Kumar Bharti and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- Amit Ghildiyal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- Dananjay Mishra and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- Narender Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- Vipul Kumar Mishra and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- In Re: to Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India and Others
- Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (Eevfam) & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt.4/5.06.2011 v. Home Secretary, Union of India & Ors.
- Akhilesh Prasad v. Union Territory of Mizoram