Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXII: Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences · E.–Suspension, remission and commutation of sentences
Section 432: Power to suspend or remit sentences
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) When any person has been sentenced to punishment for an offence, the appropriate Government may, at any time, without conditions or upon any conditions which the person sentenced accepts, suspend the execution of his sentence or remit the whole or any part of the punishment to which he has been sentenced.
(2) Whenever an application is made to the appropriate Government for the suspension or remission of a sentence, the appropriate Government may require the presiding Judge of the Court before or by which the conviction was had or confirmed, to state his opinion as to whether the application should be granted or refused, together with his reasons for such opinion and also to forward with the statement of such opinion a certified copy of the record of the trial or of such record thereof as exists.
(3) If any condition on which a sentence has been suspended or remitted is, in the opinion of the appropriate Government, not fulfilled, the appropriate Government may cancel the suspension or remission, and thereupon the person in whose favour the sentence has been suspended or remitted may, if at large, be arrested by any police officer, without warrant and remanded to undergo the unexpired portion of the sentence.
(4) The condition on which a sentence is suspended or remitted under this section may be one to be fulfilled by the person in whose favour the sentence is suspended or remitted, or one independent of his will.
(5) The appropriate Government may, by general rules or special orders, give directions as to the suspension of 1. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 31 (w.e.f.18-12-1978). 2. Ins. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 34 (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
sentences and the conditions on which petitions should be presented and dealt with:
Provided that in the case of any sentence (other than a sentence of fine) passed on a male person above the age of eighteen years, no such petition by the person sentenced or by any other person on his behalf shall be entertained, unless the person sentenced is in jail, and—
(a) where such petition is made by the person sentenced, it is presented through the officer in charge of the jail; or
(b) where such petition is made by any other person, it contains a declaration that the person sentenced is in jail.
(6) The provisions of the above sub-sections shall also apply to any order passed by a Criminal Court under any section of this Code or of any other law, which restricts the liberty of any person or imposes any liability upon him or his property.
(7) In this section and in section 433, the expression "appropriate Government" means,—
(a) in cases where the sentence is for an offence against, or the order referred to in sub-section (6) is passed under, any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends, the Central Government;
(b) in other cases, the Government of the State within which the offender is sentenced or the said order is passed.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 432
-
Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State of (NCT of Delhi) & Others
Whether, an accused/convict who has completed his “life imprisonment for a fixed term” such as twenty years of actual sentence without remission, as in the instant case, is entitled to be released from prison on…
-
Kum. Shubha @ Shubhashankar v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the conviction of the appellants by the High Court u/s.302 read with s.120-B, IPC and additionally, s.201, IPC for A-4 alone, is justified.
-
IN RE: RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF ADOLESCENTS versus
Issue arose as regards sentencing the accused; about the rehabilitation of the victim and her child; and about adopting measures for adolescent well being and child protection.
-
Firoz Khan Akbarkhan v. The State of Maharashtra
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 is justified; whether he is entitled to remission of sentence.
-
IN RE: POLICY STRATEGY FOR GRANT OF BAIL versus
The first issue is whether the power to grant remission can be exercised without the convict or anyone on behalf of the convict applying to the appropriate Government for a grant of remission. The second issue is about…
-
Mafabhai Motibhai Sagar v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
The appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Section 302 read with sections 147 and 148 Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to life imprisonment. His application for remission was considered expeditiously by the…
-
Navas @ Mulanavas v. State of Kerala
Appellant-accused was held guilty for the offences punishable u/ ss.302, 449, 309, IPC and sentenced accordingly. For the offence punishable u/s.302, IPC, he was sentenced to death. High Court confirmed the conviction,…
-
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others
Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed…
-
Joseph v. The State of Kerala
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking appropriate direction to the Sta te Government, to prematurely release him, having been in custody-actual imprisonment for over 26 years, and served a sentence…
-
Rajo @ Rajwa @ Rajendra Mandal v. The State
Petitioner serving a sentence of life imprisonment for commission of offences punishable u/ss.302/34 of the IPC, 1860 and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959 sought direction for his premature release on the ground that he has…
- Ravinder Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Rajkumar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Jaswant Singh & Ors v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
- B. A. Umesh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
- Atbir v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Ram Chander v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
- The State of Haryana & Ors v. Raj Kumar @ Bittu
- Satish @ Sabbe v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Akshay Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- H Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore (Review Petition (Crl.) Nos.446-447 of 2019) in
- Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore
- Rajan v. The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- State of Rajasthan and Others v. Mukesh Sharma
- Jitendra @ Kalla v. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Sharad Hiru Kolambe v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Muthuramalingam & Ors. v. State Rep. by Insp. of Police
- State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Lal Singh @ Manjit Singh & Ors.
- Pankajakshi (Dead) Through Lrs. & Others v. Chandrika & Others
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Ajay Kumar Pal v. Union of India and Another
- Arjun Jadav v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
- Duryodhan Rout v. State of Orlssa
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Mahesh Dhanaji Shinde v. State of Maharashtra
- Shatrughan Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Sushil Sharma v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- State of Rajasthan v. Jamil Khan
- Sujit Biswas v. State of Assam
- Krishnan & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra
- Annapurna v. State of U.P.
- Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Budh Singh v. State of Haryana and Anr.
- Life Convict Bengal @ Khoka @ Prasanta Sen v. B.K. Srivastava & Ors.
- Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab
- Sangeet & Anr. v. State of Haryana
- Surinder Singh Brar and Others Etc.Etc. v. Union of India and Others
- Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. Bani Kant Das and Ors.
- Mahamudul Hassan v. Union of India & Others
- Samjuben Gordhanbhai Koli v. State of Gujarat
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- State of Haryana and Ors. v. Jagdish
- Mulla & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- Ramraj @ Nanhoo @ Bihnu v. State of Chhatiisgarh
- Dharam Chand v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra v. State of Karnataka
- State of Haryana v. Mahender Singh and Ors.
- C.A. Pious v. The State of Kerala and Anr.
- Epuru Sudhakar and Anr. v. Govt. of A.P. and Ors.