Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter V: Arrest of Persons
Section 53: Examination of accused by medical practitioner at the request of police officer
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
If there are reasonable grounds to believe that examining an arrested person's body will provide evidence of the offence, a registered medical practitioner, at the request of a police officer of at least sub-inspector rank, can examine them and use reasonable force for it.
- A woman can be examined only by, or under the supervision of, a female registered medical practitioner.
- "Examination" includes tests of blood, semen, swabs, sputum, sweat, hair and nail clippings using modern techniques including DNA profiling.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) When a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence of such a nature and alleged to have been committed under such circumstances that there are reasonable grounds for believing that an examination of his person will afford evidence as to the commission of an offence, it shall be lawful for a registered medical practitioner, acting at the request of a police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector, and for any person acting in good faith in his aid and under his direction, to make such an examination of the person arrested as is reasonably necessary in order to ascertain the facts which may afford such evidence, and to use such force as is reasonably necessary for that purpose.
(2) Whenever the person of a female is to be examined under this section, the examination shall be made only by, or under the supervision of, a female registered medical practitioner. [Explanation.—In this section and in sections 53A and 54,—
(a) —examination‖ shall include the examination of blood, blood stains, semen, swabs in case of sexual offences, sputum and sweat, hair samples and finger nail clippings by the use of modern and scientific techniques including DNA profiling and such other tests which the registered medical practitioner thinks necessary in a particular case;
(b) —registered medical practitioner‖ means a medical practitioner who possesses any medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a State Medical Register.]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 53
-
R. Rajendran v. Kamar Nisha and Others
The High Court directed the appellant to appear before a Hospital for collection of blood samples for DNA profiling. Whether the High Court was justified in directing the appellant to undergo DNA testing.
- S v. The State and Ors
-
Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Whether the High Court erred in confirming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in…
- Sr.Sephy v. CBI & Ors
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Kathi David Raju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
- Ritesh Sinha v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
- Urmila Devi v. Yudhvir Singh
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Ritesh Sinha v. The State of Utiar Pradesh & Anr.
- Smt. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Md. Munna v. Union of India and Ors.
- Sharda v. Dharmpal