Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter IX: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Section 161: [Repealed
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Amendment of section 161, Central Act 45 of 1860.—In section 161 of the Indian Penal Code (Central Act 45 of 1860), after the explanation relating to “A motive or reward for doing”, the following explanation shall be inserted, namely:— “‘Public Servant’.— For purposes of this section and sections 162, 163, 164, 165 and 165A, the words ‘public servant’ shall denote, besides those who are public servants under section 21 or who are deemed to be ‘public servants’ within the meaning of that section under any law for the time being in force, persons falling under any of the descriptions hereinafter following, namely:—
(i) Every officer in the service or pay of the Travancore Devaswom Board or the Cochin Devaswom Board or the Cochin Devaswom Board;
(ii) Every officer in the service or pay and every member of the Wakfs Board constituted under the Wakfs Act, 1954 (Central Act 29 of 1954);
(iii) The President and every member of a Village Court or Village Panchayat Court;
(iv) Every member of the Board of Directors or of the executive or managing committee and every officer or servant of a co-operative society registered or deemed to be registered under the law relating to co-operative societies for the time being in force.
(v) Every member of the governing body and every officer or servant in the service or pay of a society registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955 or the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and receiving aid or grant from the Government;
(vi) Every teacher or other officer or servant of the University of Kerala;
(vii) Every examiner of a University Examination or a Government Examination;
(viii) Every Manager, or teacher or servant of an educational institution which receives or has received aid or grant from the Government or the University of kerala.”. [Vide Kerala Act 27 of 1962, sec. 2].
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 161
-
Aman Bhatia v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in holding that a licensed stamp vendor falls within the ambit of a public servant for the purposes of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and whether the conviction of the…
-
Devinder Kumar Bansal v. The State of Punjab
Issue arose whether the High Court justified in denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the 1988 Act and s.61(2) of the…
-
State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy
Whether High Court was justified in quashing the FIR registered against the Respondent in the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of FIR under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988;…
- Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
- The State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others v. Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman
- Jayant Etc. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
- State of Gujarat v. Mansukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah
- West U.P. Sugar Mills Association & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- Ramesan (Dead) Through Lr. Girija A v. The State of Kerala
- Mayank N Shah v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Station House Officer, Cbi/Acb/Bangalore v. B.A. Srinivasan and Anr.
- Rashmi Chopra v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
- Ambi Ram v. State of Uttarakhand
- Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.V. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
- State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors.
- K.V. Prakash Babu v. State of Karnataka
- L. Narayana Swamy v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Dev Raj v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Central Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli and Others
- State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Brijlal Sadasukh Modani
- Prof. N. K. Ganguly v. CBI New Delhi
- K.P. Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Nanjappa v. State of Karnataka
- Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab
- Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Director, Centeral Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India and Others
- V.K. Verma v. CBI
- Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by Its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
- Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau of Inv. Against Eco. Offence
- State of Uttarakhand v. Yogendra Nath Arora
- Rakesh Kapoor v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharashtra
- Om Kr. Dhankar v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- Banatwala & Company v. L.L.C. of India & Anr.
- V.S. Achuthanandan v. R. Balakrishna Pillai & Ors.
- Rajeshwar Tiwari and Ors. v. Nanda Kishore Roy
- State of M.P. v. Harishankar Bhagwan Pd. Tripathi
- Banarsi Dass v. State of Haryana