Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter IX: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Section 171: Wearing garb or carrying token used by public servant with fraudulent intent
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
Wearing the garb or carrying a token like that of a class of public servants one does not belong to, intending or knowing it likely that people will believe one belongs to it, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to three months, or a fine of up to two hundred rupees, or both.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever, not belonging to a certain class of public servants, wears any garb or carries any token resembling any garb or token used by that class of public servants, with the intention that it may be believed, or with the knowledge that it is likely to be believed, that he belongs to that class of public servants, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both. [CHAPTER IXA
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 171
-
Afjal Ansari v. State of UP
What are the parameters to be considered for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; and whether conviction…
- Gaurav Kumar @ Monu v. The State of Haryana
- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee
- Rishipal v. State of Uttarakhand
- Laxmi Narayan Nayak v. Ramratan Chaturvedi and Ors.
- N. S. Vardachari v. G. Vasantha Pai and Anr.