Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XI: Of False Evidence and Offences against Public Justice
Section 211: False charge of offence made with intent to injure
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever, with intent to cause injury to any person, institutes or causes to be instituted any criminal proceeding against that person, or falsely charges any person with having committed an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such proceeding or charge against that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both; and if such criminal proceeding be instituted on a false charge of an offence punishable with death,[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for seven years or upwards, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
State amendments to this section
Chhattisgarh.— In Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (here-in-after referred to as the Penal Code), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely: —
Provided that, if such criminal proceeding be instituted on a false charge, of an offence punishable under section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 354E, section 376B, section 376C, section 376F, section 509, section 509A or section 509B shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine. [Vide Chhattisgarh Act 25 of 2015, sec. 2].
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 211
-
Bishwajit Dey v. The State of Assam
Interim release of conveyances during the pendency of the trial in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985) cases.
-
Subrata Choudhury @ Santosh Choudhury & Ors. v. The State of Assam & Anr.
Whether after the acceptance of a negative Final Report in the first complaint, upon considering the written objections/protest petition and hearing the complainant, a fresh/second complaint on the same set of facts is…
- Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat
- Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K & Anr.
- Himanshu Kumar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
- Madhav v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pankaj Chaudhary and Ors.
- Vishnu Chandru Gaonkar v. N.M. Dessai
- Rajiv Singh v. State of Bihar & Another
- Perumal v. Janaki
- Kishore Samrite v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Abdul Rehman & Ors. v. K.M. Anees-Ul-Haq
- State of Punjab v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
- The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Vimal Kumar Surana and Another
- Mahesh Chand Sharma v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Etc.
- Esher Singh v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Hemant Dhasmana v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
- Arvinder Vir Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr