Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of offences affecting life
Section 299: Culpable homicide
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide.
Illustrations
Explanation 1.—A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death.
Explanation 2.—Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skilful treatment the death might have been prevented.
Explanation 3.—The causing of the death of a child in the mother's womb is not homicide. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 299
-
Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the High Court committed any error in bringing the case within the ambit of “attempt to commit murder” punishable u/s.307 IPC on the ground that the deceased-R died after a period of nine months from the date of…
-
Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned judgment relying on the confessional FIR filed by the appellant-accused himself and the medical evidence to uphold his conviction, however, altering it from s.302,…
-
Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the accused at the time of commission of crime was incapable of making conscious and informed decision or was suffering from certain mental incapacity or unsoundness of mind; Whether a benefit of doubt may be…
-
Yuvraj Laxmilal Kanther & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Issue arose as to whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the revision application filed by the appellants assailing the order of the trial court dismissing their discharge applications u/s.227 CrPC.
-
Shahid Ali v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
In a celebratory firing during a marriage ceremony, the Appellant shot the deceased resulting in his demise. Whether the Appellant could be held guilty of the offence under Section 304 Part I or Part II of the IPC as…
-
Shailesh Kumar v. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand)
What is the goal of investigation and what is the role of investigating officer; Are s.172 CrPC and ss. 145 & 161 of the Evidence Act to be read in consonance with each other; Can a General Diary entry precede the…
-
Sanjay Kundu v. Registrar General, High Court of
The proceedings before the High Court were initiated on an email from complainant, addressed to the Chief Justice of the High Court. The High Court suo motu registered a Criminal Writ Petition pursuant to the above…
-
N. Ramkumar v. The State Rep. by Inspector
Appellant in fit of rage, dashed head of the victim against the wall, resulting in death of victim. Appellant convicted u/s. 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. Whether judgment, order and sentence…
- Anbazhagan v. The State Represented by the
- Arvind Kumar v. State of Nct, Delhi
- Nagarathinam v. State Through the Inspector of
- Ranvir Singh Etc. Etc. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Ghulam Hassan Beigh v. Mohammad Maqbool Magrey & Ors.
- Krishnamurthy @ Gunodu and Others v. State of Karnataka
- Jasdeep Singh @ Jassu v. State of Punjab
- Vinod Kumar v. Amritpal @ Chhotu & Ors.
- Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Mohd. Rafiq @ Kallu v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
- Paul v. State of Kerala
- R. Jayapal v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
- Rajan v. The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- Yashwant Etc. v. The State of Maharashtra
- Rupinder Singh Sandhu v. State of Punjab & Others
- Tularam v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India & Another
- Hari Shankar Shukla v. State of U.P.
- Nidhi Kaim and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
- State of Rajasthan v. Ram Kailash Alias Ram Vilas
- Ramanlal and Anr. v. State of Haryana