Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Hurt
Section 324: Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing or cutting, or any instrument which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive substance, or by means of any explosive substance or by means of any substance which it is deleterious to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive into the blood, or by means of any animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 324
-
Govind Mandavi v. State of Chattisgarh
Whether the trial Court as well as the High Court committed grave errors in facts as well as in law while appreciating the evidence available on record and convicting the accused-appellant for the offences alleged…
-
State of Chhattisgarh v. Amit Aishwarya Jogi
Whether the three-Judge Bench judgment in the case of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Anr. lays down the correct proposition of law, or whether the same requires reference to, and resolution by a larger…
-
Zainul v. The State of Bihar
The High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants herein and thereby affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1989 holding the appellants herein…
-
Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the High Court committed any error in bringing the case within the ambit of “attempt to commit murder” punishable u/s.307 IPC on the ground that the deceased-R died after a period of nine months from the date of…
-
Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. The State of Maharashtra and Others
The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault on him by four…
-
Dhanya M v. State of Kerala & Ors.
Whether the preventive detention of the detenu is in accordance with law.
-
Harjinder Singh v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
Whether the evidence led, in the instant case, justified the Trial Court’s exercise of power u/s.319 CrPC to summon respondent no. 2, and whether the High Court was right in setting that order aside at the threshold.
-
Ramyash @ Lal Bahadur v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Etc. Etc
Whether the High Court erred in allowing the Correction Application filed under Section 362, CrPC by the accused persons and modifying its earlier judgment by converting the conviction under Section 302 to Section 304…
-
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora & Ors.
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I…
-
Satbir Singh v. Rajesh Kumar and Others
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court whereby it set aside the order of the trial court summoning respondents as additional accused for facing trial along with the principal accused.
-
Sita Ram & Anr. v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the appellant no.1 guilty of offence punishable u/s. 304 IPC and appellant no. 2 for offences punishable u/ss. 323 and 451 IPC and…
-
Naushey Ali & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Whether the present case is a fit case where proceedings could be quashed, particularly when Section 307, IPC inter alia was invoked and there was a settlement between the parties.
-
Kunhimuhammed@Kunheethu v. The State of Kerala
Whether appellant had the intention to commit murder; whether the appellant’s act can be brought under section 304, IPC in light of the offence being committed in exercise of private defense and thereby exceeding the…
-
Sonu Choudary v. State of NCT Delhi
Issue arose as to whether the conviction of the appellant u/ss.324 and 452 IPC is sustainable; and whether a restaurant can be said to be a place used for dwelling or for worship or for the custody of property for…
-
Suraj Singh Gujar & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In…
-
K. Ravi v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Matter pertains to the right of the accused to file a fresh application u/s.216 Cr.P.C. seeking his discharge after the charge is framed by the court, more particularly when his application seeking discharge u/s.227…
-
Vinod Jaswantray Vyas (Dead) Through Lrs v. The State of Gujarat
The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.02.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, whereby, the Division Bench partly accepted the appeal preferred by the appellant accused-A1 and…
-
Anees v. The State Govt. of NCT
Murder of appellant-accused’s wife in their house in which the appellant, deceased and their 5 year old daughter lived. s.106, Evidence Act, 1872 was invoked and the appellant was convicted u/s.302, IPC for the murder.…
-
Subhash @ Subanna & Ors. v. State of Karnataka Ministry of Home Affairs
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting and sentencing accused no. 1 u/s. 302, and accused no. 2 and 4 u/ss. 324 and 326 IPC.
-
Ravindra Kumar v. State of U.P. & ORS.
There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling…
-
Sivamani v. State Represented by Inspector of Police,
Victims sustained simple injuries. Whether Courts below were justified in convicting appellants u/s. 307 IPC.
-
Mariappan v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
On the day of incident, heated arguments took place between the two parties. During the quarrel, accused nos.1 and 2 stabbed victim multiple times with sooriknives, whil e accused no.3, though armed with a spade handle,…
-
Birbal Nath v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors
Whether the High Court was justified in acquitting the accused for the major offences u/ss. 302 and 307 IPC, and convicting them only for the offences u/ss. 147, 148, 323, 324, 325/149 and reducing their sentences to…
-
H. D. Sundara & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
The question which arose for consideration was whether the High Court was justified in setting aside t he order of acquittal passed by the trial court.
-
Zunaid v. State of Up. & Ors.
CJM rejected the final report submitted by the investigating officer and accepted the Protest Petition as the Complaint Case, whether the course opted by the CJM was just, legal and proper in the facts and circumstances…
- Sh. Rakesh Raman v. Smt. Kavita
- Balu Sudam Khalde & Anr. v. The State of
- Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. The State of Assam
- Ex-Const/Dvr Mukesh Kumar Raigar v. Union of
- Ranvir Singh Etc. Etc. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- The State of Rajasthan v. Gurbachan Singh & Others
- Gireesan Nair & Ors. Etc. v. State of Kerala
- Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K & Anr.
- Md. Jabbar Ali & Ors. v. The State of Assam
- Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India & Ors
- Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
- Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Ghulam Hassan Beigh v. Mohammad Maqbool Magrey & Ors.
- Mekala Sivaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- Abhishek v. State of Maharashtra & Ors
- Ms. P v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another
- Anuj Singh @ Ramanuj Singh @ Seth Singh v. The State of Bihar
- Ram Chander v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Banwari Lal and Another
- The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Subhash @ Pappu
- M. Nageswara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
- Sukhdarshan Singh v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
- Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.
- Taijuddin v. State of Assam & Ors.
- Hari & Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan Asaram @ Asumal Harpalani
- Prashant Singh Rajput v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
- Ramgopal & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur v. Akashdeep Morya & Anr.
- Lala @Anurag Prakash Aasre v. The State of Maharashtra
- Harjit Singh v. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and Another
- Lakshman Singh v. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
- Somesh Chaurasia v. State of M.P. & Anr.
- Dharmesh @ Dharmendra @ Dhamo Jagdishbhai @ Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat
- Kalabhai Hamirbhai Kachhot v. State of Gujarat
- Rajendra @ Rajappa and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Ramesh Alias Dapinder Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- The State of Kerala v. Mahesh
- Sartaj Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr. Etc.
- Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. The State of Odisha & Anr.
- Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb
- Ajay Kumar @ Bittu & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.
- Murali v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- Venkatesan Balasubramaniyan v. The Intelligence Officer, D.R.I. Bangalore
- State of Rajasthan v. Mehram & Ors.
- State of Odisha and Ors. v. Gobinda Behera
- Paul v. State of Kerala
- Rohtas & Anr. v. The State of Haryana
- Guru @ Gurubaran & Ors. v. State Rep. by Insp. of Police
- G H Manjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- Bharatbhai Bhimabhai Bharwad v. State of Gujarat and Others
- Postman Vengaisamy & Ors. v. State Represented by Inspector of Police & Ors.
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Rajesh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- Rashmi Chopra v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- The State Bank of India & Others v. P. Soupramaniane
- Nagji Odhavji Kumbhar & Anr. v. State of Gujarat
- Mani v. State of Kerala and Others
- Harveer Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Harjeet Singh & Anr.
- Mala Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- Pappi @ Mehboob v. State of Rajasthan
- The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kanha @ Omprakash
- State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Ganapati Rahatol & Ors.
- Shanthamalleshappa v. State of Karnataka
- Pradeep Bisoi @ Ranjit Bisoi v. The State of Odisha
- Devidas Loka Rathod v. State of Maharashtra
- Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel v. Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel & Others
- Kumar v. State Represented by Inspector of Police
- Naresh & Ors. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
- Kavita Chandrakant Lakhani v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.
- Ganga Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
- Bannareddy & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Lachhman Dass v. Resham Chand Kaler and Anr.