Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Hurt
Section 336: Act endangering life or personal safety of others
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
Doing an act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to three months, or a fine of up to two hundred and fifty rupees, or both.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever does any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months or with fine which may extend to two hundred and fifty rupees, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 336
-
State of Jharkhand v. Dr. Nishkant Dubey & Ors.
What are the essential conditions that must be satisfied to attract the provisions of Section 366 of the IPC? What are the essentials to constitute a trespass as criminal trespass? Whether the procedure provided under…
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- Bhoopendra Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Commissioner of Police v. Raj Kumar
- State of Odisha and Ors. v. Gobinda Behera
- The State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas & Anr.
- Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.
- State of Punjab v. Saurabh Bakshi
- Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Rajasthan v. Islam
- Abbas Ahmad Choudhary v. State of Assam
- Jarnail Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab
- Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr. v. State of U. P. & Ors.
- Sankaran Moitra v. Sadhna Das and Anr.
- Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab and Anr.
- Lakhwinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab
- Keshub Mahindra v. State of M.P.
- M/S. Gujarat Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. v. Collector, Central Excise, Baroda.
- Sohan Lal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan