Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of extortion
Section 387: Putting person in fear of death or of grievous hurt, in order to commit extortion
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Putting or trying to put a person in fear of death or grievous hurt to themselves or another, in order to commit extortion, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to seven years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever, in order to the committing of extortion, puts or attempts to put any person in fear of death or of grievous hurt to that person or to any other, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 387
-
M/s Balaji Traders v. The State of U.P. & Anr.
Whether the High Court was justified in observing that since no offence of extortion u/s.383 IPC is made out, consequently, no offence u/s.387 IPC would be made out.
- State v. Manoj Kumar & Ors
- Hameedullah Akbar@Parheem Modh Zai v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
- State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi ) v. Ms X & Ors
-
Gaurav Maini v. The State of Haryana
Courts below, if justified in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 364A, 392 and 120B IPC.
- Dheerpal Alias Kana v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Shaheen Akhtar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
- Akhilesh Mishra v. State (The NCT of Delhi)
- Naresh Mahato v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Devender Dubey v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Vinod Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Darshan Harish Joshi v. State(Nct of Delhi)
- Akhilesh Mishra v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Akhilesh Mishra v. State (Nct of Delhi )
- Darshan Harish Joshi v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi
- Mukeshbhai Vallabhbhai Abhangi v. State of
- The State of Gujarat v. Sandip Omprakash Gupta
- Abhishek v. State of Maharashtra & Ors
- The State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Jagshi Gangar
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Sharad Hiru Kolambe v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- State (Nct of Delhi) v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar and Anr.
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police
- Vikram Singh@ Vicky &Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Mohan Singh v. State of Bihar
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Jawant P. Sankpal v. Suman Gholap & Ors.
- Vikram Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab
- Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra
- Choudhury Parveen Sultana v. State of West Bengal and Anr.
- Mukhtiar Ahmed Ansari v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
- Amanulla Khan Kudeatalla Khan Pathan v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
- Gursharam Singh v. State of Punjab
- Henry Westmuller Roberts, Etc. Etc. v. State of Assam & Ors. Etc.
- Thakur Ram v. The State of Bihar