Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of Cheating
Section 418: Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may ensue to person whose interest offender is bound to protect
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever cheats with the knowledge that he is likely thereby to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction to which the cheating relates, he was bound, either by law, or by a legal contract, to protect, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 418
-
S.N. Vijaylakshmi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether any criminal offence in the background of the factual position is made out to justify criminal proceedings against the appellants and whether the same should proceed; whether on the same cause of action, based…
-
M.C. Ravikumar v. D.S. Velmurugan & Ors.
Whether a second quashing petition u/s.482 CrPC would be maintainable on the grounds/pleas that were available to be raised even at the time of filing/decision of the first quashing petition.
-
Sivakumar v. The Inspector of Police & Anr.
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing appellant’s petition u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of chargesheet against him.
-
Nara Chandrababu Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
Interpretation of s.17A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 incorporated by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 26 of 2018 and its applicability to the facts of the present case.
- Cardinal Mar George Alencherry v. State of
- Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Rahul Modi & Ors.
- Jitul Jentilal Kotecha v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc
- Mitesh Kumar J. Sha v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Priti Saraf & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
- Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Sardar Ali Khan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary Home Department & Anr.
- International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials (Arci) &Ors. v. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd.&Anr.
- Vesa Holdings P. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Ors.