Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of Cheating
Section 419: Punishment for cheating by personation
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever cheats by personation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 419
-
Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
Issue arose whether the direction for investigation to the police issued by the JMFC-Judicial Magistrate First Class u/s.156(3) CrPC which was quashed by the impugned orders, justified; and whether the JMFC had…
-
Mrs. Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Limited & Ors.
Whether the company petition decided in favour of the Appellant by the NCLT was maintainable u/ss.397 and 398, Companies Act, 1956 Act; assuming that the company petition was maintainable, whether the NCLT had…
-
Ashok Dhankad v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Issue arose as regards to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court enlarging the accused on regular bail u/s.483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
-
Urmila Devi & Others v. Balram & Another
Issue arose as regards correctness of the impugned order passed by the High Court dismissing the application filed by the appellants u/s.482 CrPC to quash the complaint u/ss.419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC pending before…
-
Vinod Bihari Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the applications filed u/s.482 Cr.PC by appellant for quashing the proceedings arising out of FIR u/s.2 and 3 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities…
-
Maharana Pratap Singh v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Whether due process was followed in dismissing the appellant from service and whether his dismissal from service is justified, on facts and in the circumstances; whether, in light of the facts, evidence, witnesses, and…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ashok Sirpal
Matter pertains to the challenge to the order passed by the High Court suspending the sentence of imprisonment and the fine imposed on the accused who was convicted for embezzlement of Rs. 46 lakhs.
-
V. Senthil Balaji v. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam.
-
Union of India & Ors. Etc. v. Prohlad Guha Etc.
Respondent-employees were appointed on compassionate ground. The authority found that their appointments were based on forged/ fabricated and bogus documents and their services were terminated. The issue which arises…
-
Sharif Ahmed and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Nature of chargesheets filed in some jurisdictions by the State/ Police, without stating sufficient details of the facts constituting the offense or putting the relevant evidence on record; significance of chargesheets…
-
Shadakshari v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether sanction u/s. 197 Cr.P.C. is required to prosecute respondent No. 2 who faces accusation amongst others of creating fake documents by misusing his official position as a Village Accountant, thus a public…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Narottam
In cases relating to offences arising out of the Vyapam Scam, respondents-accused filed applications seeking direction to supply a Hindi translation of the charge sheet filed by the appel lant in English language.…
- Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari & Anr. Etc.
- Sri Gulam Mustafa v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- Siju Kurian v. State of Karnataka
- Jarnail Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab
- Mla From Mau District, UP v. Jail Superintendent (Ropar) & Ors.
- Swaati Nirkhi & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
- Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- Canara Bank v. P. Selathal and Ors. Etc.Etc.
- Sardar Ali Khan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary Home Department & Anr.
- G H Kanwar Pal Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- Station House Officer, Cbi/Acb/Bangalore v. B.A. Srinivasan and Anr.
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Man Singh
- S. K. Miglani v. State NCT of Delhi
- Rajan v. The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- Brig. Sukhjeet Singh (Retd.) Mvc v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- M/S. Advanta India Ltd. v. B. N. Shivanna
- Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- State (Nct of Delhi) v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar and Anr.
- Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- State Of- Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Subhash Chandra Jaiswal and Others
- International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials (Arci) &Ors. v. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd.&Anr.
- Nagaraja Rao v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Sunil v. Sakshi @ Shweta & Anr.
- Vinod Kumar v. State of Kerala
- Vishal Agrawal & Anr. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board & Anr.
- Km. Hema Mishra v. State of U.P. and Others
- M/S. Shree Mahavir Carbon Ltd. v. Om Prakash Jalan (Financer) & Anr.
- Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Rishipal v. State of Uttarakhand
- Hema v. State, Thr. Inspector of Police, Madras
- Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad v. K. Narayana Rao
- Ajay Pandit @ Jagdish Dayabhai Patel & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- Abdul Rehman & Ors. v. K.M. Anees-Ul-Haq
- Flg. Officer Rajiv Gakhar v. Ms. Bhavana @ Sahar Wasif
- Cbi, Hyderabad v. Subramani Gopalakrishnan & Anr.
- Abubucker Siqqique and Anr. v. The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbl/Scb/Chennai, Tamil Nadu
- The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Vimal Kumar Surana and Another
- Monica Bedi v. State of Ap.
- Manisha Tyagi v. Deepak Kumar
- Md. Ibrahim & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and Ors.
- Ram Biraji Devi and Anr. v. Umesh Kumar Singh and Anr.
- Romesh Lal Jain v. Naginder Singh Rana and Ors.
- State of West Bengal v. Sadan K. Bormal and Anr.
- Manoranjan Das v. State of Jharkhand
- Ram Narain Popli v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Nazir Ahmad Bhait v. State of Delhi
- State of West Bengal v. Narayan K. Patodia
- Nilgiris Bar Association v. T.K. Mahalingam and Anr.
- Allahabad Bank and Anr. v. Deepak Kumar Bhola