Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Chapter IV: Procedure, Powers and Duties of Authorities
Section 12: Duties of conciliation officers
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was repealed and replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 from 21 November 2025. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
A conciliation officer may hold conciliation when a dispute exists or is feared, and must do so in a public utility service where a strike notice has been given.
- The officer investigates without delay and tries to bring about a fair and amicable settlement.
- If a settlement is reached, the officer sends the government a report with the signed memorandum of settlement.
- If not, the officer sends a full report with the facts and the reasons for failure, within fourteen days of starting, unless the parties agree to extend.
- If the government does not refer the dispute after the report, it must record and communicate its reasons.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, the conciliation officer may, or where the dispute relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22 has been given, shall hold conciliation proceedings in the prescribed manner.
(2) The conciliation officer shall, for the purpose of bringing about a settlement of the dispute, without delay, investigate the dispute and all matters affecting the merits and the right settlement thereof and may do all such things as he thinks fit for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute.
(3) If a settlement of the dispute or of any of the matters in dispute is arrived at in the course of the conciliation proceedings the conciliation officer shall send a report thereof to the appropriate Government [or an officer authorised in this behalf by the appropriate Government] together with a memorandum of the settlement signed by the parties to the dispute.
(4) If no such settlement is arrived at, the conciliation officer shall, as soon as practicable after the close of the investigation, send to the appropriate Government a full report setting forth the steps taken by him for ascertaining the facts and circumstances relating to the dispute and for bringing about a settlement thereof, together with a full statement of such facts and circumstances, and the reasons on account of which, in his opinion, a settlement could not be arrived at.
(5) If, on a consideration of the report referred to in sub-section (4), the appropriate Government is satisfied that there is a case for reference to a Board, [Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal], it may make such reference. Where the appropriate Government does not make such a reference it shall record and communicate to the parties concerned its reasons therefor.
(6) A report under this section shall be submitted within fourteen days of the commencement of the conciliation proceedings or within such shorter period as may be fixed by the appropriate Government: [Provided that, [subject to the approval of the conciliation officer,] the time for the submission of the report may be extended by such period as may be agreed upon in writing by all the parties to the dispute.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 12
-
Ch. Joseph v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation & Other
i) Whether the retirement of the appellant on medical grounds due to colour blindness, without offering alternative employment, is legally sustainable in light of applicable service regulations and binding settlements;…
- Bikram Bhattacharjee v. M/S Singer India Ltd
- Santosh Devi v. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital Shahdara Delhi
- Yunus Khan v. Haryana Roadways Through Its General Manager
- Vinod Kumar Gupta v. National Institute of Immunology
- National Institute of Immunology v. Vinod Kumar Gupta
- S.Mamman v. UOI Thr.Labour Enforcement Officer
- Naseem Ahmad v. Gen. Manager Vijaya Bank
- Vijaya Bank v. Naseem Ahmed
- Dtc v. Baleshwar
- Vijay Kumar Jhamb v. Union of India
- Ram Mehar v. D.D.A
- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. The President, Oil Field Employees Association & Ors.
- Sarva Shramik Sangh v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- State of Orissa & Anr. v. Bilash Chandra Ojha
- Steel Authority of India v. Madhusudan Das & Ors.
- Vijay Kumar and Ors. v. Whirlpool of India Ltd. and Ors.
- M.D., M/S. Hindustan Fasteners Pvt. Ltd. v. Nashik Workers Union
- Management, Mettur Beardsell Ltd. v. Workmen of Mettur Beardsell. Ltd. & Anr.
- Karnataka Power Corporation Limited and Anr. v. K. Thangappan and Anr.
- Central Organisation of Tamil Nadu Electricity Employees v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- Mukand Ltd. v. Mukand Staff and Officers Association
- I.T.C. Ltd. Workers Welfare Association and Anr. v. The Management of I.T.C. Ltd. and Anr.
- Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. v. V.S.R. Murthy and Ors.
- Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar v. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Board and Anr.
- The Secretary, Indian Tea Association v. Ajit Kumar Barat and Ors.
- National Engineering Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- Lokmatnewspapers Pvt. Ltd. v. Shankar Prasad
- H.M.T. Ltd. v. H.M.T. Head Office Employees Association and Ors.
- Sultan Singh v. State of Haryana and Anr.
- Wellman (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Employees State Insurance Corporation
- Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad and Others v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others
- Jitendra Nath Biswas v. Empire of India & Ceylone Tea Co. & Anr.
- All Bihar Christian Schools Association and Another. v. State of Bihar and Others.
- Christian Medical College Hospital Employees' Union & Anr. v. Christian Medical College Vellore Association & Ors.
- Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay v. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.
- V. Veerarajan & Ors. v. Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Dishergarh Power Supply Company Ltd., Calcutta & Anr. v. Workmen of Dishergarh Supply Co. Ltd. & Ors.
- General Manager, Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad v. R.S. Sharma & Ors.
- M. P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh v. The State of M. P. and Anr.
- Nirmal Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Jaswant Singh & Ors. Etc. v. Union of India and Ors. Etc.
- Prem Kakar v. State of Haryana and Anr.
- Binny Ltd v. Workmen and Anr.
- The Workmen v. Greaves Cotton & Co; Ltd. & Ors.
- Bombay Panjrapole, Bhuleshwar v. The Workmen and Another
- Management of Bangalore Woollen, Cotton & Silk Mills Co. Ltd. v. The Workmen & Anr.
- The Bombay Union of Journalists and Others v. The Hindu Bombay and Another
- Sivayogeswara Cotton Press Devangere and Others v. M Panchaksharappa and Another
- The Garment Cleaning Works v. Its Workmen
- The Bat A Shoe Co. (P) Ltd. v. D. N. Ganguly & Others
- State of Bombay v. K. P. Krishnan and Others. (And Connected Appeal)
- The Manager, Hotel Imperial v. The Chief Commissioner and Others
- Crompton Parkinson (Works) Private Ltd., Bombay v. Its Workmen and Others