Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Chapter IV: Procedure, Powers and Duties of Authorities
Section 17: Publication of reports and awards
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was repealed and replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 from 21 November 2025. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Every report, arbitration award and award of a Labour Court or Tribunal must be published by the government within thirty days of receiving it.
- A published award is final and cannot be questioned by any court, subject to section 17A. Writ jurisdiction of the High Courts and Supreme Court is not affected by this.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Every report of a Board or Court together with any minute of dissent recorded therewith, every arbitration award and every award of a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of its receipt by the appropriate Government, be published in such manner as the appropriate Government thinks fit.
(2) Subject to the provisions of section 17A, the award published under sub-section (1) shall be final and shall not be called in question by any Court in any manner whatsoever.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 17
-
Child in Conflict With Law Through His Mother v. The State of Karnataka and Another
(i) Whether the period provided for completion of preliminary assessment u/s. 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is mandatory or directory; (ii) Whether the words ‘Children’s…
- C. Bright v. The District Collector & Ors.
- M/S. Haryana Suraj Malting Ltd. v. Phool Chand
- Union of India and Anr. v. Raghuwar Pal Singh
- Rajasthan Lalit Kala Academy v. Radhey Shyam
- Chandrakant Tukaram Nikam and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad and Anr.
- B.B. Rajwanshi v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. The B.E.S.T. Workers Union
- The Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. The Workmen
- The Sirsilk Ltd. and Others v. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Another
- State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Basti Sugar Mills Co., Ltd.