Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 · Chapter IV: Procedure for Obtaining Orders of Reliefs
Section 18: Protection orders
The Magistrate may, after giving the aggrieved person and the respondent an opportunity of being heard and on being prima facie satisfied that domestic violence has taken place or is likely to take place, pass a protection order in favour of the aggrieved person and prohibit the respondent from—
(a) committing any act of domestic violence;
(b) aiding or abetting in the commission of acts of domestic violence;
(c) entering the place of employment of the aggrieved person or, if the person aggrieved is a child, its school or any other place frequented by the aggrieved person;
(d) attempting to communicate in any form, whatsoever, with the aggrieved person, including personal, oral or written or electronic or telephonic contact;
(e) alienating any assets, operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed by both the parties, jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent or singly by the respondent, including her stridhan or any other property held either jointly by the parties or separately by them without the leave of the Magistrate;
(f) causing violence to the dependants, other relatives or any person who give the aggrieved person assistance from domestic violence;
(g) committing any other act as specified in the protection order.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 18
-
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal
Whether the High Court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction u/s.482, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 or s.528, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash proceedings initiated u/s.12, Protection of Women from…
-
Prakash and Others v. The State of Maharashtra and Another
Issue arose whether the courts below were justified in accepting the prosecution case that the act of suicide by the victim was a direct result of the words uttered by the appellants at the mahalokadalat when there was…
- Nazia Habeeb v. Mohd Najam Khan
- Aseem Khanna v. Akanksha Dua
- Jitin Mittal & Ors v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Gurpreet Singh & Ors v. Protection Officer & Anr
- Ajay Kumar v. Uma
- Colonel T.K Chaterjee v. Bhramar Chaterjee
- Sanjeev Batra and Another v. Simranjeet Kaur and Another
- Aparna Choudhrie Kala & Anr v. Vaibhav Kala
- Ashok Biswas S O Anil Biswas and Anr v. The Divisional Commissioner Department of Revenue Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors
- Shyamlal Devda and Others v. Parimala
- Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji v. Kunapareddy Swarna Kumar! & Anr.
- Juveria Abdul Majid Patni v. Atif Iqbal Mansoori and Anr.
- Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma
- Saraswathy v. Babu
- Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade & Ors.