Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter VI: Of Offences against the State
Section 121A: Conspiracy to commit offences punishable by section 121
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever within or without [India] conspires to commit any of the offences punishable by section 121, *** or conspires to overawe, by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force, [the Central Government or any [State] Government ***], shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description which may extend to ten years, [and shall also be liable to fine].
Explanation.—To constitute a conspiracy under this section, it is not necessary that any act or illegal omission shall take place in pursuance thereof.]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 121A
-
Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
-
Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari v. State of Uttar Pradesh
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in custody for more than nine years.
-
The State of West Bengal v. Jayeeta Das
Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or…
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Ramjhan Gani Palani v. National Investigating Agency and Anr
- Waheed-Ur-Rehman Parra v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir
- Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya v. National Investigation Agency
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
- National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
- The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
- Ganga Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- Ved Mitier Gill v. Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh and Others
- Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Ors.
- Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharashtra
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Shaukat Hussain Guru v. State (Nct) Delhi & Anr.
- Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) v. State of Gujarat
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- Nazir Khan and Ors. v. State of Delhi
- N. Natarajan v. B.K. Subba Rao
- Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat
- R.K. Krishna Kumar v. State of Assam and Ors.