Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter VI: Of Offences against the State
Section 122: Collecting arms, etc., with intention of waging war against the Government of India
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Collecting men, arms or ammunition, or otherwise preparing to wage war, intending to wage or be prepared to wage war against the Government of India, is punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for up to ten years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever collects men, arms or ammunition or otherwise prepares to wage war with the intention of either waging or being prepared to wage war against the [Government of India], shall be punished with [imprisonment for life] or imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, [and shall also be liable to fine].
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 122
-
Athar Parwez v. Union of India
Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the…
- Javed Ali @ Javed v. National Investigation Agency
-
Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
- Bilal Ahmad Mir Alias Bilal Mir Alias Billa v. National Investigating Agency New Delhi
- Feroz Ahmed Bhatt v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Saquib Nisar v. State
- Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy v. State
-
The State of West Bengal v. Jayeeta Das
Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or…
- Abdul Wahid Sait v. National Investigation Agency
- Suhail Ahmad Thokar v. National Investigation Agency
- Zeeshan Qamar v. State of NCT Delhi
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Ramjhan Gani Palani v. National Investigating Agency and Anr
- Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya v. National Investigation Agency
- Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
- The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
- Amrutbhai Shambhubhai .Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel & Ors.
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Ors.
- Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharashtra
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Shaukat Hussain Guru v. State (Nct) Delhi & Anr.
- Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) v. State of Gujarat
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- Nazir Khan and Ors. v. State of Delhi
- Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat
- R.K. Krishna Kumar v. State of Assam and Ors.
- Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
- Kanu Sanyal v. Dist. Magistrate, Darjeeling & Ors.