Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter VI: Of Offences against the State
Section 121: Waging or attempting to wage war or abetting waging of war against the Government of India
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Waging war, attempting to wage war, or abetting the waging of war against the Government of India is punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever wages war against the [Government of India], or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such war, shall be punished with death, or [imprisonment for life] [and shall also be liable to fine]. [Illustration] * * * * *
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 121
-
Athar Parwez v. Union of India
Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the…
- Javed Ali @ Javed v. National Investigation Agency
-
Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
- Bilal Ahmad Mir Alias Bilal Mir Alias Billa v. National Investigating Agency New Delhi
- Feroz Ahmed Bhatt v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Saquib Nisar v. State
- Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy v. State
-
The State of West Bengal v. Jayeeta Das
Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or…
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Outdoor Catering Pvt Ltd Now Known As Araha Hospitality Pvt Ltd v. The State of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretar & Ors
- Zeeshan Qamar v. State of NCT Delhi
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Ram Chander v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
- Waheed-Ur-Rehman Parra v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir
- Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya v. National Investigation Agency
- Pyare Lal v. State of Haryana
- National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
- The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
- Ganga Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Amrutbhai Shambhubhai .Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel & Ors.
- Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (Eevfam) & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- Ved Mitier Gill v. Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh and Others
- Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Lingaram Kodopi v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Ors.
- Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharashtra
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- D. Ethiraj v. Secretary to Govt. & Ors.
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Shaukat Hussain Guru v. State (Nct) Delhi & Anr.
- Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) v. State of Gujarat
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- N. Natarajan v. B.K. Subba Rao
- Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat
- State of Haryana and Ors. v. Mohinder Singh
- R.K. Krishna Kumar v. State of Assam and Ors.
- Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
- Smt. Triveniben & -Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- State (Delhi Admn.) v. Jagjit Singh
- Thakur Narwar Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh