Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 · Chapter IV: Offences and Penalties
Section 27A: Punishment for financing illicit traffic and harbouring offenders
Whoever indulges in financing, directly or indirectly, any, of the activities specified in sub-clauses (i) to (v) of [ clause (viiib) of section 2] or harbours any person engaged in any of the aforementioned activities, shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two lakh rupees:
Provided that the court may, for reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a fine exceeding two lakh rupees.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 27A
-
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora & Ors.
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I…
- Angelina Hrang Than Sangi v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Mahender Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Pankaj @ Pankaj Vaid @ Amit @ Sanju Baba v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Rajat Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
- Amardeep Singh Narang v. Union of India & Ors
- Raja Jaswant Singh v. Union of India & Ors
- Amit Kumar Singh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (Dri)
- Rajender Prasad Sharma v. Ncb
- Naushad Ali Through Perokar Sahajad Ali v. UOI & Ors
- Meena v. The State
- Taha Taufiq v. Narcotics Control Bureau New Delhi
-
Balwinder Singh (Binda) v. The Narcotics
Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bure au officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession of…
- Manu Khosla v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Sarvothaman Guhan @Sarvo v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- State of West Bengal v. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh
- State by (Ncb) Bengaluru v. Pallulabid Ahmad Arimutta & Anr.
- Union of India Through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow v. Md. Nawaz Khan
- Ragini Dwivedi @ Gini @ Rags v. The State of Karnataka
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- The State of Maharashtra v. Vishwanath Maranna Shetty
- D. Ramakrishnan v. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau
- Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
- Ratan Kumar Vishwas v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Union of India v. Shri Shiv Shanker Kesari