Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 · Chapter IV: Offences and Penalties
Section 29: Punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy
(1) Whoever abets, or is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit, an offence punishable under this Chapter, shall, whether such offence be or be not committed in consequence of such abetment or in pursuance of such criminal conspiracy, and notwithstanding anything contained in section 116 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), be punishable with the punishment provided for the offence.
(2) A person abets, or is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit, an offence, within the meaning of this section, who, in India, abets or is a party to the criminal conspiracy to the commission of any act in a place without and beyond India which—
(a) would constitute an offence if committed within India; or
(b) under the laws of such place, is an offence relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances having all the legal conditions required to constitute it such an offence the same as or analogous to the legal conditions required to constitute it an offence punishable under this Chapter, if committed within India.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 29
-
Manoj Tejraj Jain v. State of Gujarat
Challenge to the judgment of the High Court whereby the appeals filed by the appellants herein were dismissed against the judgment of the trial court convicting them for offences u/ss.25A and 29, Narcotic Drugs and…
-
Nadeem Ahamed v. The State of West Bengal
Whether the Courts below erred in convicting the accused-appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.21(c) and 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
-
Khursheed Ahmad Chohan v. Union of Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. Etc.
Issue arose as to whether the facts and circumstances disclosed in the complaint, supported by compelling medical evidence of grievous injuries, including complete genital mutilation, mandatorily required registration…
-
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora & Ors.
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I…
-
Union of India Thr. I.O. Narcotics Control Bureau v. Man Singh Verma
Issue arose whether the contours of s.439 CrPC permit the grant of compensation by the High Court to the appellant for alleged wrongful confinement for four months in a matter of possession of narcotic substances.
- Rajinder Kumar v. Ncb
- Mohd.Altaf v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Tinku v. The State (Nct of Delhi)
- Syed Abu Ala v. Ncb
- Bithai Rai v. The State (Nct of Delhi)
-
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif
Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
- Delhi Police & Ors v. Krishan Kumar
- Angelina Hrang Than Sangi v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Amritpal Singh v. National Investigation Agency
- State (Nct of Delhi) Through Deputy Commissioner of Police, Crime-Iii, Delhi v. Roohullah Noori @ Akbar
- Anurag Thakur v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Moin Khan v. The State of NCT O F Delhi Through Antf Crime Branch
- Pabbar Giri @Vijay v. Union of India and Ors
- Sanjeev Kumar v. The State
- Raj Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Chima Vitalis v. State Through Ps New Delhi Railway Station
- Shrimathi S v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Veer Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Sekeleti Doris v. Customs
- Abrar@Bale v. State Through Crime Branch Sho
- Waseem Seikh v. State of NCT Delhi
- Ramandeep Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Mahender Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Pankaj @ Pankaj Vaid @ Amit @ Sanju Baba v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Rajat Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
- Aslam Noorudheen v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Dinesh v. State of Delhi
- Girish Bharti v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Ravina Kumari v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Ashok Kumar @ Lala v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Mohd. Tabrez v. State
- Hari Ram v. The State (Nct of Delhi)
- Badakulu Ladu @ Sushant v. State
- Rizauddin @ Riyajuddin @ Riyajudden @ Pintu v. Union of India & Ors
- Tanveer Alias Prince v. State NCT of Delhi
- Akil Ahmed v. State NCT of Delhi
- Rajat Tailor v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Deen Mohammad Alias Bhola v. State NCT of Delhi
- Sultan Ansari v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr
- Amardeep Singh Narang v. Union of India & Ors
- Raja Jaswant Singh v. Union of India & Ors
- Amit Kumar Singh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (Dri)
- Talim @ Talib v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Mukesh Kumar Prajapati v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Mukesh Kumar Prajapati v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Allah Noor v. Narcotics Control Bureu
-
The State of Meghalaya v. Lalrintluanga Sailo & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without taking in view the…
- Shabbir Ahmed Gojri v. State of NCT Delhi Through Sho Special Cell New Delhi
- Umar Sebandeke v. Customs
- Rakesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi Through the Sho Crime Branch, Pushp Vihar, Delhi
- Shivam v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Sunil Kumar v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Usha Devi v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Rajiv Rana v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Raaz Ali v. Narcotics Control Bureau
-
Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Ors.
The appellant was ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to various terms and conditions incorporated in the said order. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two conditions imposed while granting bail. The two conditions…
- Babli v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Md. Ayub Pathan v. The State of NCT Delhi
- Mamta Sapra v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Pankaj Rai v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Parvej Khan v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Rohit v. State
- Jagdeep Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Arif v. State
- Pradeep Mandal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Mohd Jabir v. Union of India and Ors
- Krishna v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Shradha Surana v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr. & Anr
- Vishal @ Golu v. State NCT of Delhi
- Yunus Khan v. State NCT of Delhi
- Bharat Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
- Majhar Khan @ Sonu v. State, NCT of Delhi
- Stephen v. Ncb and Anr
- Vinod Yadav v. The State
- Mohit Yadav v. State of Nct, Delhi
- Mohd. Shafi v. State NCT of Delhi
- Abdul Qaider v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Arun Kumar @ Varun v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Rajender Prasad Sharma v. Ncb
- Iliyas Khan v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Gilbert Apeh Emeka v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Santosh Kumar Pandit v. State Through Sho Ps Crime Branch
- Abul Kalam @ Sultan v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Naeem v. State NCT of Delhi
- Parveen Yadav v. The State of NCT of Delhi
- Dev Kumar @ Golu v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Vishwajeet Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Tareena v. State NCT of Delhi
- Kumar Kandivalasa v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Habibullah Nabi Zada v. N.C.B
- Kunwarpal v. State Through Sho, P.S. Special Cell
- Hikmatullah Hikmati v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Naushad Ali Through Perokar Sahajad Ali v. UOI & Ors
- Teeka Ram v. State Through Ps Special Cell